Main | August 2007 »

July 2007

July 31, 2007

Starbuckola

Starbuckscup What’s a cup of  Starbucks worth to you?
While I was trying to reboot my body with a cup of home brewed Foldgers (approximately 39 cents  per  pot),  I turned on the tube and saw the hottest news story perking since Paris’ days behind bars: the price of Starbucks is increasing an average of nine cents per cup.
I am not a Starbucks fan, but it is a trendy and acceptable Christian addiction.
If I want a cup of burnt tasting coffee, I’d head for a truck stop and nab a cuppa joe, disguising the taste with highly-flammable powdered creamer. Don't ask how I know.
Now imagine for a moment…if Starbucks Junkies gave up their low-fat lattes once a week and put that $4 to a better cause, just think of what we could do.
If the average Starbucks junkie slept through Sunday morning service without an AM caffeine fix,  he could help someone living with AIDS in Botswana.
Or, if the Christian caffeine addict gave up her lattes for a month, she could support a child through World Vision for a year.
Or, for forfeiting the same amount of trende  grande, one could pay for corrective surgery for a child with a cleft palate.Giving up one’s daily frappucinno addiction for an entire year could do something bigger, like help supply clean water to a third world country. Not to mention the savings in natural resources. By drinking a cup brewed by our vintage Mr. Coffees,we could keep a few million paper cups from ending up in a landfill.
Just think, by giving up Starbucks, we can change the world one cup at a time.
Or, we can pay nine cents more and expect the same daily grind.

July 19, 2007

Are Snacks Replacing Sex?

Large_lady_3 Move over abstinence curriculum. Big Macs could be the new form of birth control.
Last week, I got an email in my inbox from SafeYouth.org.  It’s a great newsletter supplying all kinds of info you really should know but really don’t want to, from child abuse  to kids living below the poverty level.  Anyway, this email contained findings from a childstats.gov  report that caught the eyes of pew warmers across the nation. Along with claiming teen pregnancy rates have dropped, the study stated teens are having less sex today than teens did five years back. Only 47% admitted to losing the battle with their hormones, compared to 54% in 1991.

Has the church’s abstinence campaign really been that successful? Or is it something else?

At first I rolled my eyes at the report, but I did find a bit of freakanomic truth in it. (freakanomics by the way, is a newfangled word for finding the hidden reason behind various statistics).
Based on the research I collected in the form of McDonald’s bags, Skittle wrappers and soda cans  on our youth center’s floor, I concluded that the declining sex rate could be linked to the increasing  size of waistlines.  Chubby teen girls are not chased by boys.  And now, there's more of them than ever. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of obese teens has more than doubled in the past 30 years. 

As politically incorrect as my theory might be, there is some truth to it.  If you’re in youth ministry, you never worried about the “large-bone” teen girl as much as the one with Pamela Anderson physique.  Granted, there are exceptions to this rule, but everyone from the brains at ivilliage.com  to those at Obesity Research  claim there is a link between sexual activity and body size. 
We shouldn't be happy that gluttony has possibly squashed sex as the cardinal sin among young people. Along with diabetes, heart disease and other health issues, obesity leads to a lot of other issues, including poor self-esteem. And poor self-esteem is the devils' favorite tool.
In the mean time, let’s be real. Church kids are still having sex, teen moms are still the norm in the inner-city, and HIV rates are increasing most rapidly among young African American females.  Let’s don’t let the truth get lost between the lines of the latest statistics. 

July 16, 2007

The Crave Factor

Eatercolor_5 Over the past twenty years, I’ve seen one few things that has rivaled the grotesqueness of a spit bucket. The chief one being the annual Hot Dog Eating Contest sponsored by Nathan’s Famous of Coney Island. Since competitive eating is now a professional sporting event, this contest was on the airwaves earlier this month, making viewers temporarily forgetting about world hunger.  The winner was able to consume 60 hotdogs in 12 minutes.
Now being involved in youth ministry, I’ve seen teens pound away large quantities of food. There was Jaime, who was able to down a 9-piece McNugget box, large fries and Quarter Pounder with no problem. Alex was able to eat a bag of Jet Puffed Marshmallows at one sitting without getting sick. Then there was Matt, a kid able to fit fourteen pieces of gum in his mouth at one time. But none of them compared with these pros.
Considering that this international competition had paid sponsors, you’d think that appetite appeal would be critical. Every bite taken should make the viewer hungry for the product. But Emily Post was not on the panel of judges.  So instead of wetting my appetite for grounded up animal parts and filler, these contestants resembled backed up garbage disposals, trying to keep the contents they shoved down their throats from coming back up.  Check out one contestant's reversal of fortune
Or, if you know a kid who has what it takes to have a career as a professional eater, check out the International Federation of Competitive Eating.  Why sweat college calculus when gorging 98 pickled pig's feet can gain you fame?
I wonder if the sponsors feel as if they got their money’s worth. While I’ve heard of this competition for years, it has never made me seek out a package of Nathan Hot Dogs for my summer BBQ.  The only thing that Nathan’s Hot Dog Championship made me crave was Pepto Bismol.
Advertisers are the champions of creating cravings for everything from Bertie Bott's Rotten Egg flavored jellybeans to drinks extracted from soybeans.
Now if you’re wondering how to create a craving for your program or ministry, check out Ministrycom.org’s conference in September. I’ll be giving a workshop called the CRAVE FACTOR.  In this workshop, you’ll discover ways to dial up the appeal of your program to your audience and or funders. Zero Calories. Zero TransFats. 

July 09, 2007

Original Spew

Minbudhha In February of 1984, I got a letter in the mail that changed my life. It was addressed from the Chief Creative Officer of the Leo Burnett Company that at the time, was the biggest advertising agency in the whole wide world. Now those were the days before conglomerate agencies, when animated critters ruled the marketing world. The letter I received was a response to one that I had written on a whim.  My letter contained a plea for help along with a picture of something I created small town boredom—a foam rubber “Buddha”. You see, I was experimenting with a pattern for a Cabbage Patch Doll and made the mistake of using a stretchable material. So, what was supposed to be a tiny baby kept on growing in size to resemble a sumo wrester. The polyester filled monstrosity was given the moniker “Buddha”.  I didn’t know what to do with it. So, I thought it would be funny to write a big ad agency for creative advice on what to do with it.
Surely they could help me, since they had solutions for everything from halitosis to hemorrhoids on a mass scale. Gee, my overstuffed problem wouldn’t seem so large.
I was hoping my letter would get me an invitation to visit their agency in Chicago, which was just about two hours away. Or, at least give me something funny to read while I ate my morning cornflakes.
But when I opened the letter from Leo Burnett, my world changed.
“Dear Ginger, we’ll adopt your Buddha under one condition. That’s if you come back with it to Chicago to write TV commercials.”
Blogging about it twenty years later still gives me goose bumps.
Two weeks later, I packed up my overalls, flannel shirts and sewing needles and headed to the Windy City to work as a copywriter for Leo Burnett.
My first assignments were for Velveeta, the silly putty of cheese, Rice Krispies and Eggo Waffles.
Most of my projects were for FSIs –the free standing coupon inserts you get inside the Sunday paper. Some of the bigger projects were for the freebies inside specially marked packages of cereal. These involved television production. The commercials would feature children with perfect fingers and teeth who’d discover the trinket of their dreams during their balanced breakfast.
There were Kooky Doodles, Master of the Universe Puffy Stickers, Musical Sticker Dispensers, and other gizmos more desirable than the crisped rice they were buried in! Toys kids never fought over with their siblings. Toys that defied the power of gravity and remained at the top of the cereal box instead of settling to the bottom.
While most of these prizes were made out of plastic, sometimes the free giveaway was edible. Once, the prize was a Snickers Bar. It was on this commercial shoot that I first learned about the infamous spit bucket.
Now you’re supposed to ask, “What’s a spit bucket?”
A spit bucket is the most crucial element of a commercial shoot, being more important at times than the pompous director. It is a receptacle that remains out of sight to the viewer, one that the on-camera talent spews their halfway chewed food into after each delicious bite. It’s the reason why an actor doesn’t turn green after twenty-seven spoonfuls of Wheaties, why Big Mac lovers don’t get big themselves, and why children don’t spin out of control on candy shoots.
While I saw my first spit bucket on that Snickers shoot in the early 1980’s, I’ve seen my fill of them ever since.  Contents have included but are not limited to: Big Macs, sesame seed buns, slightly nibbled fries, m&ms (with and without peanuts), candy nougat, a wide variety of yogurt varieties, marshmallow bits, wheat flakes, talking cereal, and cheese sticks. Spit buckets usually are void of movie star spew. While celebrities often star in commercials, very rarely do they actually eat the food they are hawking, which is why you haven’t seen a wheat flake with the molar marks of Michael Jordan sold on E-Bay. Alcoholic beverages seldom end up in the spit bucket, since they are still forbidden to be consumed in commercials on network television.
So all the things you think are consumed never are.
But advertisers aren’t the only ones guilty of using a spit bucket.
We use them at church all the time.
I’m not saying people are upchucking their communal wafer and micro-glass of grape juice every fourth Sunday, but the messages served to us. Too often, we go to church and never digest what  we hear. We ignore God’s hot buttons, from helping the fatherless to dealing with social injustice. So our world goes unchanged and we can’t figure out why the world makes fun of our faith.
It’s this spiritual spit bucket that lead to the creation of this cyber one.
Hopefully, the SpitBucket blog will get us to look at the ugly realities that the church has to deal with. Not  just blog about them, but power down our computers and do something about these things.  The issues will fall into three buckets (pun not intended): Urban Youth—covering the same issues you’ll find at TastyFaith.com; the Church—dealing with ideas to help the church as a whole help others; and Marketing Madness—for the times I just feel like blogging about the world of Snap! Crackle! Pop! And of course, the catch-all Miscellaneous Spew.
Your comments and posts can help others.
Let me warn you, these issues can be as ugly as a bucket full of partially chewed snickers. But dealing with them? It’s a lot more rewarding than selling cereal.

Technorati Profile